ARCHIVES OF LEAD STORIES
May 20, 2004
Police survey: profiling
a problem for Roxbury, Mattapan residents
Yawu Miller
Ask Boston residents whether they find Boston Police
officers fair and respectful and in most neighborhoods, most people
— 71.7 percent — will respond in the affirmative.
But in Boston Police districts B2 and B3, covering Roxbury and
Mattapan, only 41 and 54 percent of respondents agreed. In those
neighborhoods, respondents to a Boston Police Department telephone
survey found that racial profiling is a problem with the police
department — 66 percent of respondents in Roxbury and 70
percent in the Mattapan precinct.
Yet in the rest of the city, only 41 percent of
respondents agreed that profiling was a problem.
The results show an inverse relationship between the two areas
of the city with the highest concentration of blacks and Latinos
and the rest of the city. Area B2 encompasses all of Roxbury and
parts of Dorchester while area B3 includes Mattapan and parts
of Dorchester.
Both areas together form the core of Boston’s communities
of color where black and Latino residents apparently have interactions
with police widely at odds with those of white residents.
Police spokeswoman Beverly Ford said the department has no explanation
for the differences.
“We really don’t know why there’s a discrepancy
and we’re looking further to see what is causing this discrepancy,”
she said. “We’re going to find out what’s happening
in these neighborhoods.”
In an effort to shed light on the survey results two Banner reporters
conducted random interviews with black and Latino Boston residents,
asking them to describe their attitudes toward police and their
experiences.
Of the 14 respondents interviewed by the Banner, most reported
police behavior ranging from profiling to brutality.
Bob T., a South End resident, said blacks are often detained and
searched without reasonable suspicion.
“We tend to get questioned more and stopped more,”
he said. “They use a cover-up. They say you fit the description
of a suspect, but they never say what the description is.”
But Roslindale resident Eddie Neal, who spent ten years working
with teens in Dorchester, said police in the black community are
not as bad as their reputation.
“Bad information spreads quicker than good information,”
he said. “I’m sure there are bad officers, but there
are good officers too. A few bad cops spoil it for all the rest.”
Bad police work does make headlines. Last week the Boston Herald
ran a series on wrongful convictions, highlighting the cases of
some of the 22 men who have served long prison sentences in the
last two decades for crimes they did not commit. Most of the men
were black.
The series shone a spotlight on detective Daniel M. Keeler, who
closed more than 200 murder cases during his 12 years on the homicide
squad. Several of his convictions were overturned, suggesting
police work that is flawed at best.
Jamarhl Crawford, who heads the local chapter of the New Black
Panther Party, said police shootings also play a major role in
public perception of police conduct.
“People in the black community have witnessed cops shooting
minorities, while you rarely see or hear of white kids getting
shot by the police,” he said.
Crawford was on Humboldt Ave. last year after detective Keeler
shot a fleeing suspect whom eye-witnesses said was unarmed.
While there is no shortage of news stories covering police misconduct,
many of the people interviewed by the Banner said their perceptions
were formed by their own experiences with the police, not just
by what they read..
George Foskey, a high school student, said since he was arrested
as a suspect in an assault and battery case two years ago and
brutalized by Boston police officers, his opinion of the police
has been negative.
“I was on the ground,” he said. “I got kicked
in the face and pistol-whipped three times. Now when I see a police
officer, I think about that. If I hit someone, I’d be arrested
for assault and battery. What they did to me was the same exact
thing.”
The experiences cited by the interviewees apparently are not uncommon
for black and Latino men, particularly teenagers. Claudio Martinez,
executive director of the Hyde Square Task Force, recalled a recent
meeting between representatives of the Boston Police, State Police,
MBTA police, School Police and Boston Housing Authority police.
“The kids had nothing but bad experiences,” Martinez
said. “It’s very rare to hear of positive interactions,
particularly with the young people. I think police need more training
than they are getting on how to interact with the city’s
population of color.”
The fact that the police force remains more than 70 percent white
doesn’t help, Martinez added.
“When they’re deployed in a mostly minority neighborhood,
it looks like an occupying force,” he commented.
To be fair, Boston Police officers are not the only force that
interacts with teens. MBTA police officers routinely arrested
teenagers for offenses as minor as trespassing under a zero tolerance
policy adopted by former MBTA Police Chief Thomas O’Loughlin.
Pepe Rodriguez and Victor Germain — both high school students
— who said they were chased by an officer from the Downtown
Crossing station after they failed to board a train, did not know
there was a difference between Boston police and the transit cops.
Nor did either teen know about the MBTA’s zero tolerance
policy. Asked why they were chased, Germain said, “I think
they chased us because they wanted to harass us. They can arrest
you for anything.”
Denise Gonsalves, executive director of the Cape Verdean Community
Task Force, said community-oriented programs go a long way in
fostering batter relations between the community and police.
“There are a number of programs with youth community service
officers,” she said. “The police department needs
to stay visible.”
(Banner intern Janel Knight contributed to this story)
Back
to Lead Story Archives
Home
Page