Home Page

 

 

 

 

 

ARCHIVES OF LEAD STORIES

 

February 3, 2005

Program cuts hidden in governor’s budget

Yawu Miller

As can be expected, Governor Mitt Romney’s assessment of this year’s budget highlights the positive, noting increases in local aid and human service programs.

State funding for child care, for example, increases by 2.5 percent in Romney’s budget — a figure he noted during a meeting with reporters from black, Asian and Latino newsmedia. Romney said the changes would enable families receiving Temporary Aid for Families with Dependent Children to enter the workplace.

“The purpose is to help people go back to work, to help them with child care and to help them with job training,” he said.

But under the state’s new welfare regulations, families transitioning off welfare — those forced by the mandatory time limits into job training programs and low-wage jobs — would have no guarantee of state-funded child care vouchers, according to state Sen. Dianne Wilkerson.

Under the new guidelines proposed by the Romney administration, legal immigrants and families taking care of children who receive welfare payment would also be excluded from receiving state-funded child care vouchers.

“If you are a young mother who wants to go to work, you wouldn’t have any opportunity to fare well,” Wilkerson commented. “Once you’re off welfare the state has no responsibility.”

Romney’s budget relies on increased revenues that have occurred as the Commonwealth has bounced back from its recession. The governor told reporters that businesses in Massachusetts have created 25,000 new jobs bringing the state’s unemployment rate down from 6 percent to 4.6 percent.

In his annual State of the Commonwealth address, Romney cited savings to taxpayers from state consolidations, called for increased funding for education, vowed to merge more departments, to roll back the state income tax and cut the cost of unemployment insurance.

Romney’s proposed budget will likely undergo sweeping changes as it passes through the ways and means committees of the state’s Democrat-controlled House and Senate. If Massachusetts’ Black Legislative Caucus members are any indication, the governor may well be in for a tough battle.

“We don’t seem to have any programs for the working poor,” notes Rep. Byron Rushing. “If you do everything you’re supposed to do — get off welfare, get a job — you still need eight hours of daycare.”

Rushing says Romney’s budget is predicated on his ambitious program of consolidation, where state departments are merged together for the sake of trimming bureaucracy.

Although Romney’s budget has included $2 million for much-needed renovations to the Melnea Cass skating rink and pool on Martin Luther King Boulevard, Rushing notes that staff at that facility were cut after the Metropolitan District Commission was merged with the Department of Conservation and Recreation.

“We have fewer staff working on the South West Corridor Park, fewer staff working at the Cass Rink, and just one staff person working at Roxbury Heritage State Park,” Rushing said.

With just one staff member, the Roxbury Heritage State Park, which includes the historic Dillaway Thomas House, has no capacity to do programming.

Anticipating a thorough re-working of the state budget in the House and Senate, Wilkerson suggested that Romney’s budget is more a point of departure than a destination.

“The primary benefit of analyzing the budget is that it gives you a glimpse of how his administration sees the Commonwealth,” she said. “Poor people will not fare any better in this budget as it is written. People who are uninsured will not have any reason to think relief is coming.”

The House and Senate usually begin their discussions of the state budget in April or May.

“The first debate will be the debate on revenue,” said Rushing. “We won’t support lowering the tax rate.”

After the two chambers hold a conference committee to work out differences in their budgets, the document is forwarded to the governor, who has line-item veto power. The Legislature can override the governor’s veto with a two-thirds vote.

 

 

Back to Lead Story Archives

Home Page