Activists review voter participation strategies
Yawu Miller
From Bangor, Maine to San Diego, California there are more than
250,000 nonprofit organizations registered in the United States.
To Malia Lazu, national field director for the Center for Voting
and Democracy, those nonprofits represent a network of community
leadership that can be harnessed to energize the country’s
democratic process by bringing new voters into the political process.
It’s a strategy Lazu helped pioneer in Boston and Brockton
as executive director of MassVOTE.
“Educating the people who run nonprofits and giving them the
tools to reach out to voters is how MassVOTE has done so well,”
Lazu said, speaking during a breakfast fundraiser for the organization.
While MassVOTE (Voter Outreach, Training and Education) has done
well working with a healthy cross-section of nonprofits, the efforts
of MassVOTE and other organizations like it are being stymied by
an atmosphere of intimidation that has left many nonprofit directors
cool to electoral politics, according to Tufts University professor
Jeffrey M. Berry.
As Berry pointed out, it’s legal for nonprofits to participate
in electoral politics so long as they do not endorse or make contributions
to candidates. The Internal Revenue Service says companies can even
lobby politicians and retain their nonprofit status, so long as
they do not lobby politicians to a substantial degree.
But in a study Berry recently conducted, only 54 percent of CEOs
of American nonprofits understood that their organizations could
participate in electoral politics.
“CEOs of America’s nonprofits are not an impressive
bunch when it comes to understanding the laws regulating them,”
Berry said. “People go into nonprofits not because they’re
interested in politics, but because they’re passionate about
whatever their nonprofit does.”
The ignorance of many nonprofit heads makes the sector a vastly
untapped reservoir of organizing potential. In Boston, only a handful
of the dozens of community-based organizations, social justice groups,
community development corporations and other nonprofit entities
have participated in voter mobilization drives.
The few that have participated arguably have helped boost declining
turnout rates, changed the complexion of the city’s electorate
and altered the political dynamic of the city. Voting drives in
black and Latino communities in Roxbury, Dorchester and Jamaica
Plain have helped put those communities on the political map.
These gains are necessary to keep democracy alive in the United
States, according to Lazu.
“Representative government can’t depend on the benevolence
of its leaders,” she said. “I have to depend on the
power of its voters.”
MassVOTE’s strategy in working with nonprofits was to provide
nonprofits with technological tools like voter lists and databases
to help them reach voters as well as educational materials to help
motivate people to vote.
“We know people don’t vote because they’re not
invited into the process,” she said. “But when you get
voters into the pipeline, they will demand a more representative
government.”
MassVOTE has also fought at the municipal and state level for voter
rights, securing victories ranging from sandwich-board signs notifying
residents of upcoming elections to a court decision striking down
a House redistricting map widely perceived as undermining minority
voting power.
With better-educated nonprofit heads and better-educated voters,
democracy in the United States can strengthen its democracy and
improve the quality of elected representatives, according to Lazu.
“Civic leaders are accessible,” she said. “We
know who they are. They run nonprofits.”
|
|