Ministers put focus on youth, youth workers
Yawu Miller
A coalition of ministers has joined forces with the United Way of
Massachusetts Bay to form an initiative aimed at coordinating services
to teenagers to help prevent crime, drug-abuse, gangs and teen pregnancy.
At a March 1 press conference, members of the Black Ministerial
Alliance, the Ten Point Coalition, the Emmanuel Gospel Center and
the United Way of Massachusetts Bay held a press conference announcing
their High Risk Youth Network, a coalition of religious organizations,
social service providers and public agencies that have focused on
youth services.
The group released a report outlining what the ministers say are
the critical needs of Boston youths.
“We now have scientific, evidence-based data of the realities
of life for young people in Boston,” said Black Ministerial
Alliance Executive Director Harold Sparrow. “From here, the
real work of improving their futures, and the future of this city,
can begin.”
The ministerial organizations have been working with the United
Way since November 2004 on the High Risk Youth Network, convening
representatives of religious organizations, community-based organizations
and law enforcement and other public agencies to identify gaps in
youth services, set goals for youth development services and strengthen
the system for providing youth employment.
“We’ve reached out to as many groups as we could think
of and we’ve had a tremendous response,” Sparrow said.
Sparrow says more than 80 religious organizations and community
groups have participated in the network’s convenings, as have
the Department of Youth Services and the Department of Social Services.
Since President George Bush began promoting his “faith-based”
approach to social services, the Black Ministerial Alliance and
Ten Point Coalition have played an increasingly prominent role funding
youth initiatives. Sparrow says the BMA has received $6 million
in federal funding and made $4.5 million in grants.
Last year, however, the group lost a key federal grant for its re-entry
program, an initiative aimed at providing services for criminal
offenders returning to the community after incarceration.
The U.S. Department of Labor awarded the grant to the nonprofit
Span Inc. after the BMA reported on only 137 of the 600 offenders
it said had participated in the program, according to a Boston Globe
report.
Youth workers are questioning the BMA’s — and the Bush
administration’s — focus on providing grants to religious
organizations for youth organizing.
“Anyone involved in coordinating services for high risk youth
with city agencies and nonprofits should have a strong track record
in managing successful programs with minimal resources, as many
of the groups like the Hyde Square Task Force have done for the
last 15 years,” said Claudio Martinez, executive director
of the Task Force.
In October of 2004, a month before the formation of the High Risk
Youth Network, youth workers from established youth programs around
the city began meeting to form the United Youth and Youth Workers
of Greater Boston. Like the High Risk Youth Network, the Youth Workers
were aiming to better coordinate their work to prevent duplication
of effort.
“Each of us has different areas of expertise,” said
Marlena Rose, who directs the Roxbury Environmental Education Project
and helped form the alliance.
Last month, the alliance — which has 75 members — helped
coordinate testimony at a City Council hearing on youth services
during which teens from organizations in the city advocated for
more job opportunities and more funding for schools and after school
programs.
While the BMA has received millions of dollars in federal funds,
many of the more established youth organizations operating in and
around Boston have lost substantial funding. In 2002, when the state
withdrew funding for tobacco cessation and teen pregnancy prevention
programs, youth workers estimate that the state lost more than 1,000
teen organizing jobs.
“It was a huge resource that disappeared,” said Stanley
Pollack, executive director of Teen Empowerment.
Funding for programs targeting children up to age 12 has historically
been fairly stable, but funding for teenage programs has been subject
to sudden cuts, advocates say.
“It’s grant-driven,” said Sandy Martin, who heads
the South End, Lower Roxbury Youth Workers Alliance. “You
often have one- or two-year programs. There’s an incredible
lack of continuity.”
The 2002 funding cuts shut down teen organizing programs run out
of community health centers and other community-based organizations,
leaving many teenagers out of work. Pollack and other veteran youth
workers see youth leadership as key to preventing youth violence.
“Violence has to be resolved at the teenage level,”
he said.
Since the budget cuts began in 2002, teen violence has been making
its resurgence in low-income communities of color. There were 75
homicides in Boston last year, many of them committed by teenagers.
The mayor and Police Department have responded to the surge in violent
crimes with several initiatives, including increased police presence
in high crime areas and, according to many youth workers, increased
targeting of youth for unconstitutional searches.
The resurgence youth crime has driven much of the discussion on
youth services, but some activists caution that the focus on crime
has policy-makers focused on a deficit-oriented strategy for providing
services to youths.
The focus on crime can steer the scant resources that exist for
youth programming — mostly from private foundations —
away from groups that provide services to law-abiding teenagers.
Mariama White Hammond, executive director of Project Hip-Hop, a
youth-led organization that serves 50 to 75 teens on a regular bases
and focuses on social justice issues, said her funding requests
from the BMA have been rejected for three years in a row.
Meanwhile, lesser-known religious organizations, including churches
and church-based groups, have received BMA grants of up to $50,000.
Martinez, whose organization works with youths in the Hyde Square
and Jackson Square sections of Jamaica Plain, remains skeptical.
“I’m not familiar with the BMA’s proposed initiative
but any urgent-program-of-the-month-type of intervention and initiatives
are usually short lived and have very little positive effects on
high-risk youth,” Martinez said. “Consistent, long term
commitment from community based organizations that work day in and
day out with these youth is where foundations and government should
be spending their resources.”
|
|