Report: Contractor took workers to cleaners
Yawu Miller
State Sen. Dianne Wilkerson walked out of a legislative briefing
on UNICCO Services Company — the janitorial firm hired to
clean the State House and other state office buildings — clutching
a stack of papers.
Among them was a weekly payroll report form the firm filed with
the state listing its workers, their hours worked, their rate of
pay and payments into their pension fund and health care benefits.
“This is not what they were paying people,” she said,
holding up the report. “I’ve seen the pay stubs.”
In all, UNICCO and the firms it subcontracted with are alleged to
have underpaid their employees a total of at least $80,000 a year
for the past five years.
UNICCO did not return phone calls for comment by the Banner’s
press deadline.
Wilkerson said the revelations that UNICCO was not paying a prevailing
wage sparked outrage in the State House.
“The Legislature found out that right under our noses we had
a contractor who was abusing the employees and stealing their money,”
she said.
UNICCO won a competitive bid for the contract to clean the State
House and other state buildings. Under state law, contractors with
the state are required to pay the prevailing wage — the hourly
wage, benefits and overtime paid to a majority of workers in the
state as determined by the Department of Labor.
The funds allocated in the budget for the cleaning contracts at
state office buildings are allocated based on lawmakers’ faith
that the workers are being paid the prevailing wage. The falsified
payroll report forms apparently helped reinforce that belief.
“It seems to me that in the future we can’t trust what
contractors are telling us, which is a terrible thing,” said
state Rep. Byron Rushing. “We really have to listen to the
workers.”
Union officials at SEIU Local 615 were alerted to the problem by
workers at the Boston Convention Center and began investigating
UNICCO’s compensation to workers there and at other state-owned
buildings. Their findings, contained in a report forwarded to state
legislators, were that the firm has engaged in a pattern of abusive
treatment of its workers.
In 2002, UNICCO paid out $1 million to settle a sexual harassment
suit against female employees of the firm. According to a complaint
filed against UNICCO, the company failed to act on women’s
claims that they were being harassed and retaliated against the
women and forced them to quit.
The firm was also fined $152,500 in December last year after two
UNICCO window washers plunged from a building in an accident the
U.S. Labor Department’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration
found was the result of a pattern of willful repeat violations of
safety standards.
In the current wage case, UNICCO has agreed to pay the workers the
wages they are owed, but Wilkerson warns that the firm has violated
the state’s Prevailing Wage Law, which may mean employees
are entitled to triple damages.
While lawmakers met in a Senate conference room, SEIU Local 615
President Rocio Saenz led union activists in a protest against UNICCO
at Post Office Square. UNICCO’s labor practices stem in part
from the country’s refusal to grant rights to undocumented
immigrants, according to Saenz.
“As long as we have an immigration system that denies 11 million
people the path to citizenship, everybody suffers,” she said.
“It’s easier to exploit immigrant workers who have no
legal status.”
|
|