Needles bill vetoed,
but override is near
Serghino
René
State Rep. Byron
Rushing wasn’t surprised.
Given Gov. Mitt Romney’s presidential aspirations and courting
of the conservative right, passage of clean needles legislation
was a long-shot.
“Romney is demonstrating to the national constituency of conservatives
that even though they are losing the battle [on this issue] he is
still on their side,” said Rushing.
As it stands, Massachusetts is one of only three states that outlaw
possession of a hypodermic needle without a medical prescription.
Last month, Romney vetoed the bill that would authorize the sale
of needles as a way to further reduce the spread of HIV/AIDS, hepatitis
C and other blood-born diseases.
Romney told reporters that signing the bill would promote the wrong
message by appearing to condone drug usage.
“We believe that upon review of this bill that some of the
unintended consequences could be more severe than the benefits that
would be achieved by signing the bill,” Romney said. “For
that reason I have vetoed the bill that has been brought to my desk.”
Lt. Gov. Kerry Healey stood firmly behind Romney’s decision,
saying the bill was misguided, would lead to a dramatic increase
in the number of discarded needles and put park and beach visitors
as well as neighborhood residents at risk.
Based on the numbers, Romney is not entirely wrong. Even though
the state doesn’t have a clean needles law, the transmission
of disease through dirty needles appears to have declined significantly
over the years.
Department of Public Health statistics indicate that the transmission
rate of HIV/AIDS through intravenous needle use has dropped from
32.8 percent of new cases in 1997 to 15.7 percent of new cases in
2004.
But over the same period, a number of fatal overdoses and heroin
related hospitalizations have jumped dramatically. In 1997, there
were 9,612 heroin-related hospitalizations. By 2004, that number
had nearly doubled to 17,704. In addition, heroin overdoses that
have resulted in death have jumped from 172 to 574 during the same
time period.
To supporters of the Clean Needles Bill, the Romney administration’s
defense only fosters the belief that addiction is just a crime,
not a public health issue. They further argue that dispensing clean
needles doesn’t increase illegal drug usage and would further
reduce the transmission of diseases.
“There is no proof that providing clean needles increases
drug usage,” said Cathy Morales, executive director of the
Boston Living Center. “Giving out condoms doesn’t increase
sex, it just keeps people safer.”
Rushing was particularly disappointed. He was one of the original
sponsors of the legislation back in 1995.
“[Romney] is not willing to adopt what is now an approved
form of cutting down the number of HIV/AIDS cases,” says Rushing.
“By not signing the bill he is saying that addicts should
stop being drug addicts before they get treatment. [This bill] will
help stop the rate of transmission and let addicts know that even
though they are addicts, the state is still concerned about their
welfare.”
Barbara Goulart, a senior RN and infection control officer at Whittier
Street Health Center, refuses to give into the idea that providing
needles will promote increased drug use. She believes that in a
perfect world, eradicating the use of illegal drugs would be a great
solution, but this bill is the best and most practical way to combat
the problem.
“The goal is to keep people from becoming infected while working
to become clean,” said Goulart. “If you teach someone
to use needles safely, it’s a step forward towards helping
themselves.”
If the bill passes, nonprescription needle sales would be legalized
to people over the age of 18 and needle possession would be decriminalized.
In addition, pharmacists would have to provide brochures, created
by the state Department of Public Health, with information on the
proper use and disposal of syringes and hypodermic needles.
Over the years Rushing has worked with elected officials and community
advocates in an attempt to create needle exchange programs where
dirty needles are swapped for clean ones. Although the state Department
of Health supports the idea, Rushing said the issue remains controversial
and there has been no support from the Romney administration.
Rushing says a large part of the problem lies with how the government
views addiction.
“If you go to the emergency room and you’re an addict,
chances are you’ll enter a detox program, but won’t
receive a regimen to get you off drugs,” said Rushing. “It’s
the same as going to the emergency room with a broken arm, only
to be told that the doctors can’t do anything for you. But
they can give you information on how not to break it again.”
Morales said addiction is more than just people experimenting with
drugs.
“We have to stop seeing drug usage as a problem people bring
upon themselves. It’s a disease and takes many years of work
and support,” said Morales. “Being judgmental doesn’t
help anyone.”
|
|